CASE CATEGORIES
Developer – Budgets & Reserves – Standard of Care
Developer on Board of Directors – Standard of Care
Board of Directors – Maintenance Responsibilities – Standard of Care
Board of Directors – Standard of Care
Management Company – Standard of Care
Reserve Study – Standard of Care
Other
Expert Witness Services
AVAILABLE IN OREGON, WASHINGTON, CALIFORNIA, NEVADA & ARIZONA
​
Bicksler and Associates has provided expert witness services in a mulitude of cases, including those concerning condominiums, townhomes, common interest subdivisions, expert testimony on budgets, reserves, management and standards of care.
CASE CATEGORY:
RESERVE STUDY – STANDARD OF CARE
-
Retained by defendant through David Miller of Nevin & Hall, an Oakland law firm. Case entitled Stonehedge Community Association vs. Leisure Capitol '85, et al. Superior Court, Sacramento. My scope of work is to opine upon the adequacy of the defendant's Reserve Analysis and the standard of care of a condominium Board of Directors. The case settled prior to trial
​
-
Retained by defendant through Mark Himelstein of counsel with Jon York & Associates, a Berkeley law firm. Case entitled Campana v. The Gardens HOA, County of San Mateo. My scope of work was to prepare an opinion regarding the Association’s reserve funding program and its maintenance programs. The case settled prior to trial.
​
-
Retained by plaintiff through Joseph M. Breall of Breall & Breall, a San Francisco law firm. Case entitled Martinez-Mont vs. Pacific Point HOA, County of San Mateo. My scope of work was to prepare an opinion regarding the Association’s reserve funding program and its maintenance programs. The case settled prior to trial.
​
-
Retained by defendant, through Ellen H. Nolting of McNamara, Houston, Dodge, McClure and Ney, a Walnut Creek law firm. Case entitled Sears vs. Orindawoods Association. My scope of work is to prepare an opinion regarding the appropriateness of the Association's Reserve Study. The case has settled.
​
-
Retained by defendant, through Roy Girard of Wagner, Kirkman & Blaine, a Sacramento law firm. Case entitled Marbro vs. Sacramento Sutter. My scope of work is to opine upon the adequacy of the defendant's Reserve Analysis and the standard of care of a condominium Board of Directors. The case settled prior to trial.​